AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 18.72 GTexel / s versus 6.5 billion / sec
- 8x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 48
- 3.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 599.0 gflops versus 155.5 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1024 MB
- 1800x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 896 versus 322
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 versus 131
- 4.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5684 versus 1283
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.111 versus 2.471
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 253.178 versus 77.99
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.211 versus 0.233
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 versus 6.018
- 18.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 versus 4.053
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1645 versus 555
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 versus 835
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1677 versus 1155
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1645 versus 555
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 versus 835
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1677 versus 1155
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 versus 2 April 2012 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.72 GTexel / s versus 6.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 versus 48 |
Performance á point flottant | 599.0 gflops versus 155.5 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1024 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 versus 322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 versus 131 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 versus 1283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 versus 2.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 versus 77.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 versus 0.233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 versus 6.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 versus 4.053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 versus 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 versus 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 versus 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 versus 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 versus 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 versus 1155 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 730 MHz
- Environ 72% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 29 Watt versus 50 Watt
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 730 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 | 322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 131 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 | 1283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | 2.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | 77.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | 0.233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | 6.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | 4.053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 | 1155 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Oland | GF119 |
Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 | 2 April 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1199 | 1626 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $39.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 780 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz | 810 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 599.0 gflops | 155.5 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.72 GTexel / s | 6.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 29 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 292 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 48 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 102 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1024 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA |