AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM vs ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM and ATI Radeon 9800 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 380 MHz
- 6.8x more texture fill rate: 20.6 GTexel / s vs 3.04 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 680 MHz
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 223 vs 175
- 12.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 851 vs 66
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 1 October 2003 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 380 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s vs 3.04 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 680 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 vs 175 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 851 vs 66 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM | ATI Radeon 9800 PRO |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7050 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1430 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1430 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5002 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5002 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 | 175 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 851 | 66 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM | ATI Radeon 9800 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Hainan | R360 |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 1 October 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1014 | 1011 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 380 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 3.04 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 47 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 117 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 21.76 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 680 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR |