AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 845M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 845M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7050 vs 6112
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5002 vs 3358
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5002 vs 3358
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 223 vs 213
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 26 August 2015 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7050 vs 6112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5002 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5002 vs 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 vs 213 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 845M
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1071 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 27.62 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 34% better floating-point performance: 883.7 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2320 vs 1430
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2320 vs 1430
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3287 vs 1843
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3287 vs 1843
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1524 vs 851
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1071 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 27.62 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 883.7 gflops vs 659.2 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2320 vs 1430 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2320 vs 1430 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3287 vs 1843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3287 vs 1843 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1524 vs 851 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 845M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 845M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7050 | 6112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1430 | 2320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1430 | 2320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1843 | 3287 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1843 | 3287 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5002 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5002 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 | 213 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 851 | 1524 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.387 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.073 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 845M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Hainan | GM108 |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 26 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1028 | 1029 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1071 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 883.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 27.62 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 420
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
ATIFireGL X1-256
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
AMDRadeon E8860
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
IntelHD Graphics P630
