AMD Radeon R5 M230 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M230 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 17.1 GTexel / s vs 15.6 billion / sec
- 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 156 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 416 vs 330
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 128 vs 79
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2401 vs 2239
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2401 vs 2239
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2014 vs 23 October 2008 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.1 GTexel / s vs 15.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops vs 156 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 416 vs 330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 vs 79 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2401 vs 2239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2401 vs 2239 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
- Around 97% higher core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 825 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 416 | 330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | 79 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4596 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.593 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.386 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.852 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.789 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.196 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 985 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2401 | 2239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 985 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2401 | 2239 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 M230 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | Jet | G94 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2014 | 23 October 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1439 | 1436 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1625 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | 156 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.1 GTexel / s | 15.6 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Two Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| HD3D | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 M230 with others
AMDRadeon R5 M230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO 512
AMDRadeon R5 M230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720M
AMDRadeon R5 M230 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400E
AMDRadeon R5 M230 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M
AMDRadeon R5 M230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810M
AMDRadeon R5 M230 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M360
