AMD Radeon R5 M230 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M230 and NVIDIA Quadro K1100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 542.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4596 vs 3025
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.852 vs 0.642
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.789 vs 11.732
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.196 vs 16.3
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1927 vs 861
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2401 vs 1443
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 vs 861
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2401 vs 1443
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2014 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops vs 542.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4596 vs 3025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.852 vs 0.642 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.789 vs 11.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.196 vs 16.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 vs 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2401 vs 1443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 vs 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2401 vs 1443 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 22.59 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1090 vs 414
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 128
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 vs 8.593
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 174.555 vs 143.386
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 vs 985
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 vs 985
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 22.59 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 vs 414 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 vs 128 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 vs 8.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 vs 143.386 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 vs 985 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 vs 985 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M230
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 414 | 1090 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | 254 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4596 | 3025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.593 | 8.649 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.386 | 174.555 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.852 | 0.642 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.789 | 11.732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.196 | 16.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 985 | 1892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 | 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2401 | 1443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 985 | 1892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 | 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2401 | 1443 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M230 | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Jet | GK107 |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Launch date | 7 January 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1441 | 1442 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109.94 | |
Price now | $79 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.59 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | |
Compute units | 5 | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 17.1 GTexel / s | 22.59 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | 44.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
HD3D | ||
Powerplay | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |