AMD Radeon R5 M240 vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M240 and AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M240
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 20.6 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 320 vs 160
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 458 vs 336
- 8.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6975 vs 782
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 September 2014 vs 21 December 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops vs 248.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 458 vs 336 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6975 vs 782 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 164 vs 150
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 vs 150 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M240
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 M240 | AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 458 | 336 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 164 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6975 | 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1444 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1444 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3249 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3249 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 881 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 M240 | AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Jet | Caicos |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series |
Launch date | 18 September 2014 | 21 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1298 | 1299 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 248.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 6.2 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 370 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | Not Listed | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory type | Not Listed | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
HD3D | ||
Powerplay | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |