AMD Radeon R7 M445 vs AMD Radeon R5 M240

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M445 and AMD Radeon R5 M240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M445

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 944 vs 451
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 176 vs 156
  • Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5343 vs 3721
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 vs 881
  • Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2138 vs 1444
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 vs 881
  • Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2138 vs 1444
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 May 2016 vs 18 September 2014
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 944 vs 451
PassMark - G2D Mark 176 vs 156
Geekbench - OpenCL 5343 vs 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1913 vs 881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2138 vs 1444
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1913 vs 881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2138 vs 1444

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M240

  • Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz
  • Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 20.6 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
  • Around 12% better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
  • Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3249 vs 1853
  • Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3249 vs 1853
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz
Texture fill rate 20.6 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 659.2 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3249 vs 1853
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3249 vs 1853

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M445
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M240

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
944
451
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
176
156
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5343
3721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1913
881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2138
1444
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1853
3249
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1913
881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2138
1444
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1853
3249
Name AMD Radeon R7 M445 AMD Radeon R5 M240
PassMark - G3D Mark 944 451
PassMark - G2D Mark 176 156
Geekbench - OpenCL 5343 3721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 278.624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.335
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 54.067
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1913 881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2138 1444
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1853 3249
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1913 881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2138 1444
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1853 3249

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 M445 AMD Radeon R5 M240

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Meso Jet
Launch date 15 May 2016 18 September 2014
Place in performance rating 1308 1310
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R5 200 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 920 MHz
Core clock speed 780 MHz 1000 MHz
Floating-point performance 588.8 gflops 659.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 320 320
Texture fill rate 18.4 GTexel / s 20.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15-25 Watt
Transistor count 3,100 million 1,040 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support Not Listed

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 11
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Vulkan
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 32 GB / s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 Not Listed
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
DualGraphics
Enduro
HD3D
Powerplay
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore