AMD Radeon R7 M445 vs AMD Radeon R5 M240
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M445 and AMD Radeon R5 M240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M445
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 944 vs 451
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 176 vs 156
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5343 vs 3721
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 vs 881
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2138 vs 1444
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 vs 881
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2138 vs 1444
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 18 September 2014 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 944 vs 451 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 vs 156 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5343 vs 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 vs 881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2138 vs 1444 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 vs 881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2138 vs 1444 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M240
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 20.6 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3249 vs 1853
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3249 vs 1853
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops vs 588.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3249 vs 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3249 vs 1853 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M445
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M240
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M445 | AMD Radeon R5 M240 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 944 | 451 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 | 156 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5343 | 3721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 278.624 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.268 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.335 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.067 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 | 881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2138 | 1444 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1853 | 3249 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 | 881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2138 | 1444 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1853 | 3249 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M445 | AMD Radeon R5 M240 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Meso | Jet |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 18 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1308 | 1310 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 920 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s | 20.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15-25 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | Not Listed | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
HD3D | ||
Powerplay | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |