AMD Radeon R7 M445 vs AMD Radeon R5 M240
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M445 and AMD Radeon R5 M240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M445
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 939 vs 458
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 176 vs 150
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 vs 881
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2138 vs 1444
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 vs 881
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2138 vs 1444
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 18 September 2014 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 939 vs 458 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 vs 150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 vs 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2138 vs 1444 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 vs 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2138 vs 1444 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M240
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 20.6 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6975 vs 5361
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3249 vs 1853
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3249 vs 1853
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops vs 588.8 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6975 vs 5361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3249 vs 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3249 vs 1853 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M445
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M240
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M445 | AMD Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 939 | 458 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 | 150 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5361 | 6975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 278.624 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.268 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.335 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.067 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 | 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2138 | 1444 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1853 | 3249 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 | 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2138 | 1444 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1853 | 3249 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M445 | AMD Radeon R5 M240 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Meso | Jet |
| Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 18 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1296 | 1298 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 920 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s | 20.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15-25 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Bus support | Not Listed | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| HD3D | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||

