AMD Radeon R5 M330 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 M330 and AMD Radeon R7 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M330

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 780 MHz
  • Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 20.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 32% better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
  • 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 vs 274
  • Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5874 vs 5331
  • Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.096 vs 60.326
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 8 October 2013
Boost clock speed 1030 MHz vs 780 MHz
Texture fill rate 20.6 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 659.2 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt vs 50 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 519 vs 274
Geekbench - OpenCL 5874 vs 5331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 69.096 vs 60.326

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240

  • Around 15% higher memory clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 902 vs 596
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1688 vs 1155
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1850
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2691
  • Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1688 vs 1155
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1850
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2691
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 1150 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 902 vs 596
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1688 vs 1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2342 vs 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 2691
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1688 vs 1155
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2342 vs 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 2691

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M330
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 240

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
596
902
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
519
274
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5874
5331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
69.096
60.326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1155
1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1850
2342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2691
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1155
1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1850
2342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2691
3353
Name AMD Radeon R5 M330 AMD Radeon R7 240
PassMark - G3D Mark 596 902
PassMark - G2D Mark 519 274
Geekbench - OpenCL 5874 5331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 69.096 60.326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1155 1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1850 2342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2691 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1155 1688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1850 2342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2691 3353
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 13.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 290.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.59
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 M330 AMD Radeon R7 240

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Exo Oland
Design AMD Radeon R5 300 Series AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Launch date 5 May 2015 8 October 2013
Place in performance rating 926 1236
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $69
Price now $49.99
Value for money (0-100) 24.92

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1030 MHz 780 MHz
Compute units 5
Core clock speed 955 MHz
Floating-point performance 659.2 gflops 499.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 320 320
Texture fill rate 20.6 GTexel / s 15.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 1,040 million 1,040 million
Stream Processors 320

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None N / A
Length 168 mm

API support

DirectX 12 12
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 72 GB/s
Memory bus width 64 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz 1150 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DualGraphics
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync