AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
Launch date | 1 June 2016 vs 4 December 2007 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 567 MHz vs 200 MHz
Core clock speed | 567 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
Name | AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.596 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 85.634 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.407 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.139 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 14.246 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 568 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 568 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Stoney | G98 |
Launch date | 1 June 2016 | 4 December 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1690 | 1687 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 567 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 210 million |
Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops | |
Pipelines | 8 | |
Texture fill rate | 4.54 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR2 |