AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs AMD FirePro S4000X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM and AMD FirePro S4000X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 74 GTexel / s vs 31 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 2,368 gflops vs 992.0 gflops
- Around 24% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 4500 MHz
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 74 GTexel / s vs 31 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,368 gflops vs 992.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S4000X
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 150 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S4000X
Name | AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM | AMD FirePro S4000X |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.089 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 478.725 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.934 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 92.567 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM | AMD FirePro S4000X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Curacao | Venus |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 | 7 August 2014 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1439 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | 775 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,368 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 74 GTexel / s | 31 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 210 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |