AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs AMD FirePro S9050
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5500 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel / s vs 74 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
- Around 36% better floating-point performance: 3,226 gflops vs 2,368 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s vs 74 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops vs 2,368 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050
Name | AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM | AMD FirePro S9050 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4901 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.324 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1463.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.491 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.133 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 344.551 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6260 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6260 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13032 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM | AMD FirePro S9050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Curacao | Tahiti |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 | 7 August 2014 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 373 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,368 gflops | 3,226 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 74 GTexel / s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 210 mm | 254 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 264 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |