AMD Radeon R7 350 vs AMD Radeon R5 M420
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350 and AMD Radeon R5 M420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 512 vs 320
- Around 50% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 547.2 gflops
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2072 vs 972
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3122 vs 2979
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3165
- 125.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2072 vs 16.5
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3122 vs 2979
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3165
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 July 2016 vs 15 May 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s vs 17.1 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops vs 547.2 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 vs 972 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 vs 2979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3165 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 vs 16.5 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 vs 2979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3165 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M420
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14165 vs 7719
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14165 vs 7719 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M420
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 350 | AMD Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7719 | 14165 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.507 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.719 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 | 972 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 | 2979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3165 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 | 16.5 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 | 2979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3165 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 487 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 350 | AMD Radeon R5 M420 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde | Jet |
| Launch date | 6 July 2016 | 15 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1121 | 1122 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 17.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,040 million |
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 350 with others
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Ultra
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 420 Go
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M440
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M420
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
AMDRadeon 530
