AMD Radeon R7 350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA GeForce 930MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 24.48 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 783.4 gflops
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7719 vs 5525
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.507 vs 23.565
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 vs 165.338
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.719 vs 1.09
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2072 vs 2053
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2072 vs 2053
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 July 2016 vs 1 March 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s vs 24.48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops vs 783.4 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7719 vs 5525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.507 vs 23.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 vs 165.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.719 vs 1.09 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 vs 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 vs 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 952 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3577 vs 3122
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3577 vs 3122
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 952 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 vs 3122 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 vs 3122 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7719 | 5525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.507 | 23.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | 165.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.719 | 1.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 | 3577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 | 3577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1289 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 495 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Cape Verde | GM108 |
Launch date | 6 July 2016 | 1 March 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1121 | 1124 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 952 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | 783.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 24.48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 17 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Boost clock speed | 1020 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |