AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 24.79 GTexel / s
- Around 2% better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 793.3 gflops
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7955 vs 6108
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3127 vs 1813
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3127 vs 1813
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6862 vs 3309
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6862 vs 3309
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 18 February 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 24.79 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops vs 793.3 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7955 vs 6108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3127 vs 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3127 vs 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 vs 3309 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 vs 2097
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 vs 2097
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 vs 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 vs 2097 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7955 | 6108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2097 | 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2097 | 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3127 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3127 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 | 3309 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2135 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 475 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.835 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.651 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Oland | GM107 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 18 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 807 | 979 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 793.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 24.79 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |