NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 31.78 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 26% better floating-point performance: 1,017 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 vs 7892
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 2097
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3127
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 2097
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3127
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1072 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops vs 806.4 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 vs 7892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 vs 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 vs 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3127 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 993 MHz
- 2048x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6862 vs 3358
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6862 vs 3358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 993 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2844 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 | 7892 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 | 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 6862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 | 2097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 6862 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Oland |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $200.89 | |
| Place in performance rating | 834 | 835 |
| Price now | $203.37 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.10 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1072 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 806.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB / 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro M1000M with others
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8210E
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs
AMDFirePro S9300 X2
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs
AMDRadeon 530X
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 2100
