AMD Radeon R7 M265DX vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M265DX and NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 499 vs 462
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2014 vs 1 November 2007 |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 499 vs 462 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 175 vs 138
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 vs 138 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M265DX | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15678 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 138 | 175 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 499 | 462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2485 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M265DX | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Jet | G92 |
Launch date | 7 January 2014 | 1 November 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1144 | 1148 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 240 gflops | |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-HE |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
SLI |