AMD Radeon R7 M440 vs AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M440 and AMD Radeon R4 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M440
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1021 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 20.42 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 320 vs 128
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 653.4 gflops vs 204.8 gflops
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 897 vs 342
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 170 vs 99
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1935 vs 701
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1935 vs 701
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2067 vs 1338
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2067 vs 1338
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2537 vs 1811
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2537 vs 1811
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 11 June 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1021 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.42 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 653.4 gflops vs 204.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 vs 342 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 170 vs 99 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1935 vs 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1935 vs 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2067 vs 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2067 vs 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2537 vs 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2537 vs 1811 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 vs 5598
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 vs 5598 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M440
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M440 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 342 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 170 | 99 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1935 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1935 | 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2067 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2067 | 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2537 | 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2537 | 1811 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5598 | 8386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.721 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 107.613 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.445 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.097 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M440 | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Meso | Beema |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 11 June 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1112 | 1540 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1021 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 653.4 gflops | 204.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 20.42 GTexel / s | 6.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 930 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Shared memory | 0 |