AMD Radeon R7 M440 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M440 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R7 M440

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M440

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1021 MHz vs 657 MHz
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB

Launch date	15 May 2016 vs 30 May 2013
Core clock speed	1021 MHz vs 657 MHz
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

2.1x more texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s
2.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 320
Around 54% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 653.4 gflops
Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1720 vs 895
Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 172
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 vs 1935
Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 vs 1935
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2728 vs 2067
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2728 vs 2067
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2537
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2537

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	42.05 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 320
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops vs 653.4 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1720 vs 895
PassMark - G2D Mark	232 vs 172
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2836 vs 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2836 vs 1935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2728 vs 2067
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2728 vs 2067
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333 vs 2537
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333 vs 2537
Geekbench - OpenCL	5605 vs 5598

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M440
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

895

1720

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

172

232

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1935

2836

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1935

2836

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2067

2728

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2067

2728

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2537

3333

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2537

3333

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5598

5605

Name	AMD Radeon R7 M440	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
PassMark - G3D Mark	895	1720
PassMark - G2D Mark	172	232
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1935	2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1935	2836
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2067	2728
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2067	2728
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2537	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2537	3333
Geekbench - OpenCL	5598	5605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		15.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		509.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		30.422
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		53.992
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 M440	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Kepler
Code name	Meso	GK106
Launch date	15 May 2016	30 May 2013
Place in performance rating	1123	1127
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	1021 MHz	657 MHz
Floating-point performance	653.4 gflops	1,009 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	320	768
Texture fill rate	20.42 GTexel / s	42.05 GTexel / s
Transistor count	3,100 million	2,540 million
Boost clock speed		657 MHz
CUDA cores		768
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		55 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size		large
SLI options		1
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	16 GB / s	64.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Standard memory configuration		GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA