AMD Radeon R7 M440 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M440 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon R7 M440

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M440

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1021 MHz vs 625 MHz
Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 20.42 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
Around 36% better floating-point performance: 653.4 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1935 vs 1453
Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1935 vs 1453
Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5598 vs 3930

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 May 2016 vs 5 October 2011
Core clock speed	1021 MHz vs 625 MHz
Texture fill rate	20.42 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
Pipelines	320 vs 192
Floating-point performance	653.4 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1935 vs 1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1935 vs 1453
Geekbench - OpenCL	5598 vs 3930

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 976 vs 897
Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 170
Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3447 vs 2067
Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3447 vs 2067
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2537
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2537

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	2600 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	976 vs 897
PassMark - G2D Mark	323 vs 170
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3447 vs 2067
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3447 vs 2067
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 2537
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 2537

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M440
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

897

976

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

170

323

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1935

1453

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1935

1453

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2067

3447

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2067

3447

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2537

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2537

3353

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5598

3930

Name	AMD Radeon R7 M440	NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
PassMark - G3D Mark	897	976
PassMark - G2D Mark	170	323
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1935	1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1935	1453
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2067	3447
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2067	3447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2537	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2537	3353
Geekbench - OpenCL	5598	3930
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		11.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		320.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		12.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		31.168

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 M440	NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Fermi
Code name	Meso	GF106
Launch date	15 May 2016	5 October 2011
Place in performance rating	1112	1115
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$599
Price now		$209
Value for money (0-100)		7.27
Technical info
Core clock speed	1021 MHz	625 MHz
Floating-point performance	653.4 gflops	480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	320	192
Texture fill rate	20.42 GTexel / s	20 GTexel / s
Transistor count	3,100 million	1,170 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		62 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		178 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	16 GB / s	41.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory	0