AMD Radeon R7 M445 vs ATI Radeon 9000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M445 and ATI Radeon 9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M445
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 18.4x more texture fill rate: 18.4 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 15-25 Watt vs 28 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 64 MB
- 10x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 234.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 939 vs 4
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 176 vs 123
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 1 July 2002 |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz vs 250 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15-25 Watt vs 28 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 64 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 939 vs 4 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 vs 123 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M445
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M445 | ATI Radeon 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 939 | 4 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 | 123 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5361 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 278.624 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.268 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.335 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.067 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2138 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1853 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2138 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1853 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M445 | ATI Radeon 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Rage 7 |
| Code name | Meso | RV250 |
| Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 1 July 2002 |
| Place in performance rating | 1296 | 1294 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 920 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | |
| Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15-25 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 4x |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
