AMD Radeon R7 M445 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M445 and NVIDIA GeForce 920M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M445
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 18.4 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- Around 98% better floating-point performance: 588.8 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 15-25 Watt vs 33 Watt
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 943 vs 721
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 176 vs 118
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5345 vs 3697
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.765 vs 8.358
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 278.624 vs 157.606
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.268 vs 0.843
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.335 vs 15.374
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 54.067 vs 40.443
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 vs 1598
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 vs 1598
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 13 March 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15-25 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 943 vs 721 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 vs 118 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5345 vs 3697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.765 vs 8.358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 278.624 vs 157.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.268 vs 0.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.335 vs 15.374 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.067 vs 40.443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 vs 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 vs 1598 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 2138
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1853
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 2138
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1853
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 vs 2138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 vs 2138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1853 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M445
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M445 | NVIDIA GeForce 920M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 943 | 721 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 | 118 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5345 | 3697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.765 | 8.358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 278.624 | 157.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.268 | 0.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.335 | 15.374 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.067 | 40.443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 | 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2138 | 3636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1853 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 | 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2138 | 3636 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1853 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M445 | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Meso | GK208B |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1309 | 1310 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 920 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 954 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15-25 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |