AMD Radeon R7 M445 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M445 and NVIDIA GeForce 920M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M445

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 18.4 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• Around 98% better floating-point performance: 588.8 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 15-25 Watt vs 33 Watt
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 944 vs 720
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 176 vs 118
• Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5345 vs 3704
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.765 vs 8.358
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 278.624 vs 157.606
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.268 vs 0.843
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.335 vs 15.374
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 54.067 vs 40.443
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 vs 1598
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 vs 1598

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• Around 22% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 780 MHz
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 2138
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1853
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 2138
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1853

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M445
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	944 720
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	176 118
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5345 3704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.765 8.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	278.624 157.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.268 0.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.335 15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.067 40.443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1913 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2138 3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1853 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1913 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2138 3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1853 3358

Compare specifications (specs)