AMD Radeon R7 M460 vs ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M460 and ATI Radeon 9200 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M460
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 5.5x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
- 5.4x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 332 MHz
- 357.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1073 vs 3
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 206 vs 129
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 1 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 332 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1073 vs 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 206 vs 129 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9200 SE
- 29.6x more texture fill rate: 800 MTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M460
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9200 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M460 | ATI Radeon 9200 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1073 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 206 | 129 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4999 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.679 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.572 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.024 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1767 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2772 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1767 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M460 | ATI Radeon 9200 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Rage 7 |
Code name | Meso | RV280 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 1 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1224 | 1221 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 800 MTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 36 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 2.656 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 332 MHz |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory type | DDR |