Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs AMD Radeon R7 M460
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 617 and AMD Radeon R7 M460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 617
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 933.3x more texture fill rate: 25.20 GTexel/s vs 27 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 206
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 vs 15 May 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.20 GTexel/s vs 27 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 vs 206 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M460
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4999 vs 3290
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 vs 1313
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 vs 1313
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1767 vs 1461
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1767 vs 1461
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2772 vs 1633
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2772 vs 1633
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1073 vs 874
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4999 vs 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 vs 1313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 vs 1313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1767 vs 1461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1767 vs 1461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2772 vs 1633 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2772 vs 1633 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1073 vs 874 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M460
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | AMD Radeon R7 M460 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3290 | 4999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1313 | 2294 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1313 | 2294 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1461 | 1767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1461 | 1767 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1633 | 2772 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1633 | 2772 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 206 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 874 | 1073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.679 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.673 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.572 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.024 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.168 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 617 | AMD Radeon R7 M460 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Amber Lake GT2 | Meso |
| Launch date | 7 November 2018 | 15 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1223 | 1224 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.20 GTexel/s | 27 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 617 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 SE
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5900 ZT
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 940
