Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 vs AMD Radeon R7 M460
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 and AMD Radeon R7 M460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 vs 2772
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 vs 2772
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 2772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 2772 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M460
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 27 GTexel / s vs 24.00 GB/s
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s vs 24.00 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M460
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 | AMD Radeon R7 M460 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 2772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 2772 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1073 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 206 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4999 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.679 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.572 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.024 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1767 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1767 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 | AMD Radeon R7 M460 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 11.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Ice Lake GT2 | Meso |
Launch price (MSRP) | $969 | |
Place in performance rating | 1222 | 1224 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1690 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 845 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 24.00 GB/s | 27 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 |