AMD Radeon R7 M460 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M460 and AMD Radeon R7 M260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M460
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 620 MHz
- Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 715 MHz
- Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 27 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
- Around 57% better floating-point performance: 864.0 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1043 vs 988
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 200 vs 161
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 vs 1893
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 vs 1893
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 6 December 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 620 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 715 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops vs 549.1 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1043 vs 988 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 200 vs 161 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 vs 1893 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 vs 1893 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5753 vs 4999
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 2772
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 2772
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5753 vs 4999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1775 vs 1767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3158 vs 2772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1775 vs 1767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3158 vs 2772 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M460
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M460 | AMD Radeon R7 M260X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1043 | 988 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 200 | 161 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4999 | 5753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.679 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.572 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.024 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 | 1893 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1767 | 1775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2772 | 3158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 | 1893 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1767 | 1775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2772 | 3158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M460 | AMD Radeon R7 M260X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Meso | Opal |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 6 December 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1229 | 1230 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1125 MHz | 715 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 620 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 549.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 27 GTexel / s | 17.16 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,040 million |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |