AMD Radeon R7 M520 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M520 and NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 6.4x more texture fill rate: 20.6 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 20x more pipelines: 320 vs 16
- 25.8x better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 600 MHz
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 February 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops vs 25.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M520 | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17889 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 85 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 778 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M520 | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Oland | G86 |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 February 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1185 | 1182 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 25.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 13 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 210 million |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2 / GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |