AMD Radeon R8 M365DX vs AMD Radeon HD 8650G

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R8 M365DX and AMD Radeon HD 8650G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M365DX

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 69% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 533 MHz
  • Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 720 MHz
  • 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
  • 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5601 vs 1796
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1229 vs 736
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1229 vs 736
  • Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 197 vs 139
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 602 vs 526
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 June 2015 vs 1 May 2013
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 533 MHz
Boost clock speed 1125 MHz vs 720 MHz
Pipelines 768 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5601 vs 1796
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1229 vs 736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1229 vs 736
PassMark - G2D Mark 197 vs 139
PassMark - G3D Mark 602 vs 526

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8650G

  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2062 vs 1370
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2062 vs 1370
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2017
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2017
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2062 vs 1370
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2062 vs 1370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 2017
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 2017

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8650G

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5601
1796
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1229
736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1229
736
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1370
2062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1370
2062
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2017
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2017
3353
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
197
139
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
602
526
Name AMD Radeon R8 M365DX AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Geekbench - OpenCL 5601 1796
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1229 736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1229 736
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1370 2062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1370 2062
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2017 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2017 3353
PassMark - G2D Mark 197 139
PassMark - G3D Mark 602 526

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R8 M365DX AMD Radeon HD 8650G

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Terascale 3
Code name Meso Richland
Launch date 3 June 2015 1 May 2013
Place in performance rating 1266 1270
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1125 MHz 720 MHz
Core clock speed 900 MHz 533 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 32 nm
Pipelines 768 384
Transistor count 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP
Laptop size medium sized medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 11
OpenGL 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Memory bus width 128 + 64 Bit
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0 1