AMD Radeon R8 M365DX vs AMD Radeon HD 8650G

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R8 M365DX and AMD Radeon HD 8650G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

AMD Radeon R8 M365DX

AMD Radeon HD 8650G

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M365DX

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 69% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 533 MHz
Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 720 MHz
2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5601 vs 1731
Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1229 vs 736
Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1229 vs 736
Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 199 vs 138
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 647 vs 524

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 June 2015 vs 1 May 2013
Core clock speed	900 MHz vs 533 MHz
Boost clock speed	1125 MHz vs 720 MHz
Pipelines	768 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	5601 vs 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1229 vs 736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1229 vs 736
PassMark - G2D Mark	199 vs 138
PassMark - G3D Mark	647 vs 524

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8650G

Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2062 vs 1370
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2062 vs 1370
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2017
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2017

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2062 vs 1370
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2062 vs 1370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 2017
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 2017

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8650G

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5601

1731

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1229

736

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1229

736

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1370

2062

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1370

2062

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2017

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2017

3353

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

199

138

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

647

524

Name	AMD Radeon R8 M365DX	AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Geekbench - OpenCL	5601	1731
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1229	736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1229	736
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1370	2062
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1370	2062
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2017	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2017	3353
PassMark - G2D Mark	199	138
PassMark - G3D Mark	647	524

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R8 M365DX	AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Terascale 3
Code name	Meso	Richland
Launch date	3 June 2015	1 May 2013
Place in performance rating	1270	1273
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1125 MHz	720 MHz
Core clock speed	900 MHz	533 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Pipelines	768	384
Transistor count	3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP
Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	11
OpenGL	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Memory bus width	128 + 64 Bit
Memory type	DDR3
Shared memory	0	1