Intel HD Graphics 530 vs AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and AMD Radeon R8 M365DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 996 vs 647
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 199
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 1370
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2017
- Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 1370
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2017
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 3 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 996 vs 647 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 199 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 vs 1370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 2017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 vs 1370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 2017 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5601 vs 4379
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1229 vs 1045
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1229 vs 1045
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5601 vs 4379 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1229 vs 1045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1229 vs 1045 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 530 | AMD Radeon R8 M365DX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 996 | 647 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 199 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4379 | 5601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.747 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 330.464 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.804 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.781 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.177 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1045 | 1229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2393 | 1370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 2017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1045 | 1229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2393 | 1370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 2017 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 384 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 530 | AMD Radeon R8 M365DX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT2 | Meso |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 3 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1271 | 1272 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |