Intel HD Graphics 530 vs AMD Radeon R8 M365DX

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 530 and AMD Radeon R8 M365DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1125 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 996 vs 647
  • Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 199
  • Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2393 vs 1370
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2017
  • Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2393 vs 1370
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2017
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 3 June 2015
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 996 vs 647
PassMark - G2D Mark 253 vs 199
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2393 vs 1370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 2017
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2393 vs 1370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 2017

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M365DX

  • 2.6x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
  • Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5601 vs 4381
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1229 vs 1045
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1229 vs 1045
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 350 MHz
Pipelines 768 vs 24
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5601 vs 4381
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1229 vs 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1229 vs 1045

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 530
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R8 M365DX

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
996
647
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
253
199
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4381
5601
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1045
1229
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2393
1370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
2017
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1045
1229
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2393
1370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
2017
Name Intel HD Graphics 530 AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
PassMark - G3D Mark 996 647
PassMark - G2D Mark 253 199
Geekbench - OpenCL 4381 5601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 30.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 330.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 30.177
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1045 1229
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2393 1370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 2017
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1045 1229
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2393 1370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 2017
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 384

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel HD Graphics 530 AMD Radeon R8 M365DX

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 GCN 3.0
Code name Skylake GT2 Meso
Launch date 1 September 2015 3 June 2015
Place in performance rating 1271 1272
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1150 MHz 1125 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz 900 MHz
Floating-point performance 403.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 24 768
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 IGP
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 64 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 + 64 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 DDR3
Shared memory 1 0