AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs AMD Radeon R8 M365DX

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and AMD Radeon R8 M365DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 888 vs 647
  • Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 199
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1412 vs 1229
  • Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 vs 1370
  • Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3174 vs 2017
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1412 vs 1229
  • Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 vs 1370
  • Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3174 vs 2017
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 February 2018 vs 3 June 2015
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 888 vs 647
PassMark - G2D Mark 304 vs 199
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1412 vs 1229
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2111 vs 1370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3174 vs 2017
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1412 vs 1229
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2111 vs 1370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3174 vs 2017

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R8 M365DX

  • 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 4x more pipelines: 768 vs 192
  • Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5601 vs 3949
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1125 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Pipelines 768 vs 192
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5601 vs 3949

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R8 M365DX

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
888
647
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
304
199
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3949
5601
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1412
1229
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2111
1370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3174
2017
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1412
1229
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2111
1370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3174
2017
Name AMD Radeon Vega 3 AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
PassMark - G3D Mark 888 647
PassMark - G2D Mark 304 199
Geekbench - OpenCL 3949 5601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 183.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.75
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 18.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 60.006
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1412 1229
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2111 1370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3174 2017
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1412 1229
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2111 1370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3174 2017
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 418

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Vega 3 AMD Radeon R8 M365DX

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 GCN 3.0
Code name Owl Meso
Launch date 13 February 2018 3 June 2015
Place in performance rating 1269 1272
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz 1125 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 900 MHz
Floating-point performance 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 192 768
Texture fill rate 12 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 4,940 million 3,100 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP IGP
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size medium sized

Memory

Memory type System Shared DDR3
Memory bus width 128 + 64 Bit
Shared memory 0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.5
Vulkan