AMD Radeon R9 280X vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 280X and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 902 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 685 vs 543
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 89.187 vs 67.178
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.656 vs 7.435
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 493.57 vs 355.166
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 23 July 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 902 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 685 vs 543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 vs 67.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.656 vs 7.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 vs 355.166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 216.5 GTexel / s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
- Around 41% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 2048
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 5,196 gflops vs 4,096 gflops
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8059 vs 6209
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1816.61 vs 1434.496
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.889 vs 87.459
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 9603
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 9603
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 216.5 GTexel / s vs 128.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 5,196 gflops vs 4,096 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8059 vs 6209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1816.61 vs 1434.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.889 vs 87.459 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12657 vs 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12657 vs 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3700 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 280X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 280X | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6209 | 8059 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 685 | 543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 | 67.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 | 1816.61 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.656 | 7.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 | 88.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 | 355.166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2347 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22920 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 280X | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | GK110B |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $5,265 |
Place in performance rating | 378 | 361 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Price now | $833.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 902 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops | 5,196 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2880 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s | 216.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 7,080 million |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 275 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |