NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

AMD Radeon R9 280X

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1000 MHz
810.2x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
6.3x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6890 vs 6166

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 8 October 2013
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3703 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3703 vs 3700
PassMark - G3D Mark	6890 vs 6166

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X

2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 vs 7682
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 vs 7682
Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 677 vs 423

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2048 vs 1024
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9603 vs 7682
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9603 vs 7682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3356
PassMark - G2D Mark	677 vs 423

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

9603

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

9603

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3357

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

423

677

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6890

6166

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	AMD Radeon R9 280X
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7682	9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7682	9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3703	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3703	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3357
Geekbench - OpenCL	41088
PassMark - G2D Mark	423	677
PassMark - G3D Mark	6890	6166
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		89.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1434.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.656
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		87.459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		493.57
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2351

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	AMD Radeon R9 280X
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Code name	TU117	Tahiti
Launch date	27 May 2019	8 October 2013
Place in performance rating	389	391
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$299
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	103.7 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.636 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.318 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	2048
Pixel fill rate	51.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s	128.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	4,313 million
Floating-point performance		4,096 gflops
Stream Processors		2048
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Length		275 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	288 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)