NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 810.2x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6927 vs 6216
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 8 October 2013
Boost clock speed 1620 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate 103.7 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3703 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3703 vs 3700
PassMark - G3D Mark 6927 vs 6216

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X

  • 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 vs 7682
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 vs 7682
  • Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 688 vs 429
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2048 vs 1024
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9603 vs 7682
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9603 vs 7682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3356
PassMark - G2D Mark 688 vs 429

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7682
9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7682
9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3703
3700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3703
3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3357
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
429
688
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6927
6216
Name NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q AMD Radeon R9 280X
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7682 9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7682 9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3703 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3703 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3357
Geekbench - OpenCL 41315
PassMark - G2D Mark 429 688
PassMark - G3D Mark 6927 6216
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 89.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1434.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.656
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 87.459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 493.57
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2339

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q AMD Radeon R9 280X

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 1.0
Code name TU117 Tahiti
Launch date 27 May 2019 8 October 2013
Place in performance rating 381 375
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $299

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1620 MHz 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.318 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 2048
Pixel fill rate 51.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 103.7 GTexel/s 128.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 4,313 million
Floating-point performance 4,096 gflops
Stream Processors 2048

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Width IGP
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Length 275 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 288 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)