AMD Radeon R9 290X vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 290X and ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 44x more texture fill rate: 176.0 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
- 35.2x more pipelines: 2816 vs 80
- 70.4x better floating-point performance: 5,632 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 50.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8644 vs 170
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 770 vs 352
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 October 2013 vs 1 April 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 176.0 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 5,632 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8644 vs 170 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 770 vs 352 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View
- 14.7x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 290X
GPU 2: ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 290X | ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8644 | 170 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 770 | 352 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.883 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2460.464 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.12 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.942 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 628.757 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7055 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7055 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3952 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 290X | ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Hawaii | Cedar |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 24 October 2013 | 1 April 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Place in performance rating | 287 | 446 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 947 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 5,632 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2816 | 80 |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 176.0 GTexel / s | 4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 17 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 292 million |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 275 mm | 170 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 32.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |