NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher boost clock speed: 1647 MHz vs 947 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10440 vs 8618
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16345 vs 8729
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16345 vs 8729
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 24 October 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1647 MHz vs 947 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10440 vs 8618 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16345 vs 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16345 vs 8729 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 176.0 GTexel / s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
- Around 57% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 1792
- Around 28% better floating-point performance: 5,632 gflops vs 4,398 gflops
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 765 vs 489
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43456 vs 39513
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 vs 3714
- 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 103
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 vs 3714
- 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 103
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 176.0 GTexel / s vs 137.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 5,632 gflops vs 4,398 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 765 vs 489 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43456 vs 39513 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7055 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7055 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 103 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10440 | 8618 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 489 | 765 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39513 | 43456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16345 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 103 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16345 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 103 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 3925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 117.322 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2460.464 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.12 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.942 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 628.757 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 290X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Hawaii |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 24 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 300 | 301 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1647 MHz | 947 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1227 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops | 5,632 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2816 |
Texture fill rate | 137.4 GTexel / s | 176.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 6,200 million |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 275 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | 320 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |