NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 74% higher boost clock speed: 1647 MHz vs 947 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz
  • Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10440 vs 8618
  • Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16345 vs 8729
  • Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16345 vs 8729
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 February 2018 vs 24 October 2013
Boost clock speed 1647 MHz vs 947 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 10440 vs 8618
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16345 vs 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16345 vs 8729

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X

  • Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 176.0 GTexel / s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
  • Around 57% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 1792
  • Around 28% better floating-point performance: 5,632 gflops vs 4,398 gflops
  • Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 765 vs 489
  • Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43456 vs 39513
  • Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 vs 3714
  • 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 103
  • Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 vs 3714
  • 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 103
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 176.0 GTexel / s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2816 vs 1792
Floating-point performance 5,632 gflops vs 4,398 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 765 vs 489
Geekbench - OpenCL 43456 vs 39513
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7055 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 103
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7055 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 103

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
10440
8618
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
489
765
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
39513
43456
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16345
8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
103
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16345
8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
103
3353
Name NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile AMD Radeon R9 290X
PassMark - G3D Mark 10440 8618
PassMark - G2D Mark 489 765
Geekbench - OpenCL 39513 43456
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16345 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 103 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16345 8729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 7055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 103 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0 3925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 117.322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2460.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 11.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 120.942
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 628.757

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile AMD Radeon R9 290X

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 2.0
Code name GP104 Hawaii
Launch date 21 February 2018 24 October 2013
Place in performance rating 300 301
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $549

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1647 MHz 947 MHz
Core clock speed 1227 MHz
Floating-point performance 4,398 gflops 5,632 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1792 2816
Texture fill rate 137.4 GTexel / s 176.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 7,200 million 6,200 million
Stream Processors 2560

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Length 275 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.3 GB / s 320 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz 1250 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)