AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 290X2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 116.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 176.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 18.7 billion / sec
- 16x more pipelines: 2x 2816 vs 352
- 18.8x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,632 gflops vs 598.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Launch date | 24 June 2014 vs 25 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 176.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 18.7 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 2816 vs 352 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,632 gflops vs 598.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
- 5.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 580 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 580 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 290X2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
Name | AMD Radeon R9 290X2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.441 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1617 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Hawaii | GF100 |
Launch date | 24 June 2014 | 25 May 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | |
Place in performance rating | 304 | 300 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,632 gflops | 598.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2816 | 352 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 176.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 18.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 580 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 4x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 345.6 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |