NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 30HX and AMD Radeon R9 290X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 30HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 72.2x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 2x 176.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 580 Watt
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 vs 24 June 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 2x 176.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 580 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X2
- 4x more pipelines: 2x 2816 vs 1408
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 6 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Pipelines | 2x 2816 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 30HX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X2
Name | NVIDIA CMP 30HX | AMD Radeon R9 290X2 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68128 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.441 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX | AMD Radeon R9 290X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | TU116 | Hawaii |
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 | 24 June 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 294 | 275 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2x 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s | 2x 176.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 580 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,632 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 4x 8-pin |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2x 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 2x 345.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 2x 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 5400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |