AMD Radeon R9 350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 612 MHz
- 6x more pipelines: 768 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 171 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) vs 1080 MHz
Launch date | 12 June 2015 vs 2 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 612 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 171 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) vs 1080 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9892 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 643 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 252 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tobago | Tesla |
Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 2 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 614 | 618 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Code name | G80 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $829 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 612 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 128 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 171 Watt |
CUDA cores | 612 | |
Floating-point performance | 387.1 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 39.2 billion / sec | |
Transistor count | 681 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDCP | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 270 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 103.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 1080 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
SLI |