AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 580 MHz
• 5.4x more texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 9.28 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 320
• 4.3x better floating-point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 371.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
• 4.3x more memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• 8.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 366
• Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 248

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850

• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 85 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3032 366
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	460 248

Compare specifications (specs)