AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 58.97 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
• Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
• Around 17% better floating-point performance: 1,887 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 85 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 14269
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.158 vs 39.283
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 876.241 vs 815.354
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.983 vs 3.437
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.599 vs 63.718
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.258 vs 171.258
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3340
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

• Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 2528
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 420
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4468 vs 3301
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 2086
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4468 vs 3301
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 2086

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2528 3032
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	420 460
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	51217 14269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.158 39.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	876.241 815.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.983 3.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.599 63.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	194.258 171.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3301 4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2086 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6466 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3301 4468
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2086 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6466 3340

Compare specifications (specs)