NVIDIA T500 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T500 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T500 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 1883.3x more texture fill rate: 94.92 GTexel/s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5095 vs 4468
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5095 vs 4468
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29076 vs 14269
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s vs 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 85 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 vs 4468 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 vs 4468 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29076 vs 14269 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
- 5.2x more memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 3199
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 3199
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 vs 3199 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 vs 3199 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3339 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T500 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T500 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 | 4468 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 | 4468 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 | 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 | 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3340 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29076 | 14269 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3032 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.283 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 815.354 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.437 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.718 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T500 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Tobago |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 648 | 650 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 94.92 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.075 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.037 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 896 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 54.24 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 2,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 165 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 104.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 6500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T500 Mobile with others
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3430
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 360 OEM
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
