AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 738 MHz
• 4.3x more texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 11.81 GTexel / s
• 24x more pipelines: 768 vs 32
• 13.7x better floating-point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 117.5 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
• 6.4x more memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 1008 MHz
• 17.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3032 vs 169
• 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 80
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.718 vs 38.948
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 1731
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 1731

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

• Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 85 Watt
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 179.899 vs 39.283
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1813.265 vs 815.354
• 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.817 vs 3.437
• 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 757.451 vs 171.258
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3689 vs 3667
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3689 vs 3667

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3032 169
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	460 80
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.283 179.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	815.354 1813.265
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.437 13.817
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	63.718 38.948
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	171.258 757.451
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3667 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3667 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 1731

Compare specifications (specs)