AMD Radeon R9 370 vs AMD Radeon R9 M360
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370 and AMD Radeon R9 M360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 975 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 1280 vs 512
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
- 5x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 vs 1812
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 399
- 9.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 8176
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.576 vs 19.479
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 336.491 vs 87.811
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6096 vs 2801
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1623
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6096 vs 2801
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1623
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 975 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 947.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 vs 1812 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 vs 399 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 vs 8176 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 vs 19.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 vs 87.811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6096 vs 2801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 1623 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6096 vs 2801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 1623 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M360
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 370 | AMD Radeon R9 M360 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 | 1812 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 | 399 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 | 8176 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 | 19.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 | 87.811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6096 | 2801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 1623 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6096 | 2801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 1623 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 575.773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.902 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.15 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 370 | AMD Radeon R9 M360 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Trinidad | Tropo |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 414 | 1003 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | 29.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,500 million |
Compute units | 8 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 221 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |