AMD Radeon R9 370 vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370 and NVIDIA GeForce 825M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 9% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 850 MHz
  • Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 975 MHz vs 941 MHz
  • 2.6x more texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s
  • 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
  • 3.5x better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 vs 782
  • 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 247
  • 4.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 15796
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 27 January 2014
Core clock speed 925 MHz vs 850 MHz
Boost clock speed 975 MHz vs 941 MHz
Texture fill rate 78 GTexel / s vs 30.11 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1280 vs 384
Floating-point performance 2,496 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 5600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4722 vs 782
PassMark - G2D Mark 781 vs 247
Geekbench - OpenCL 75346 vs 15796

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M

  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 110 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt vs 110 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 825M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4722
782
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
781
247
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
75346
15796
Name AMD Radeon R9 370 NVIDIA GeForce 825M
PassMark - G3D Mark 4722 782
PassMark - G2D Mark 781 247
Geekbench - OpenCL 75346 15796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 64.576
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 336.491
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 370 NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler 2.0
Code name Trinidad GK208
Launch date 5 May 2015 27 January 2014
Place in performance rating 404 790
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 975 MHz 941 MHz
Core clock speed 925 MHz 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,496 gflops 722.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1280 384
Texture fill rate 78 GTexel / s 30.11 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 33 Watt
Transistor count 2,800 million 1300 Million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Length 221 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin None
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 179.2 GB / s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 5600 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0