AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 and ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 9.6x more texture fill rate: 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2x 2560 vs 2x 800
- 5.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,120 gflops vs 2x 1,000.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1990 MHz
Launch date | 3 September 2015 vs 7 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 2560 vs 2x 800 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,120 gflops vs 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1990 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 580 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 580 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
Name | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.128 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1132 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 | ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Grenada | R700 |
Launch date | 3 September 2015 | 7 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | $420 |
Place in performance rating | 246 | 244 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,120 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2560 | 2x 800 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 2x 25 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 580 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 4x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 345.6 GB / s | 2x 63.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 512 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |