NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80 and AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80
- 79.4x more texture fill rate: 171.4 GTexel/s vs 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- Around 93% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 580 Watt
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s vs 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt vs 580 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 562 MHz
- 2.1x more pipelines: 2x 2560 vs 2496
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 12 GB
- 4.3x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective
Launch date | 3 September 2015 vs 17 Nov 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Pipelines | 2x 2560 vs 2496 |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 12 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80 | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5852 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.128 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GK210 | Grenada |
Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 | 3 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 256 | 257 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 824 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,371 GFLOPS (1:3) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.113 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2496 | 2x 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.85 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 580 Watt |
Transistor count | 7100 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,120 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 4x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 2x 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s | 2x 345.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 2x 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective | 5400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |