AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 A375 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 A375
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 738 MHz
- 3132.9x more texture fill rate: 37.00 GTexel/s vs 11.81 GTexel / s
- 20x more pipelines: 640 vs 32
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) vs 1008 MHz
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 51
- 6.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1024 vs 166
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2015 vs 10 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 738 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 GTexel/s vs 11.81 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 32 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) vs 1008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 vs 51 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1024 vs 166 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 A375
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 A375 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 51 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1024 | 166 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 179.899 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1813.265 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.817 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.948 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 757.451 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1731 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 A375 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Venus | G96C |
Launch date | 2015 | 10 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 635 | 632 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 738 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1184 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 32 |
Pixel fill rate | 14.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 GTexel/s | 11.81 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1500 million | 314 million |
Floating-point performance | 117.5 gflops | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 16.13 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 1008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |