AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 A375 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 A375
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 4.5x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 3557.7x more texture fill rate: 37.00 GTexel/s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
Launch date | 2015 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 GTexel/s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 40 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 232
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1191 vs 1024
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 vs 232 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1191 vs 1024 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 A375
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 A375 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 399 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1024 | 1191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2095 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2095 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5081 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3285 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 A375 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Venus | Haswell GT3e |
Launch date | 2015 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 633 | 644 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1184 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 40 |
Pixel fill rate | 14.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 GTexel/s | 10.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1500 million | 392 million |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |