Intel Arc Pro A40 vs AMD Radeon R9 A375
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A40 and AMD Radeon R9 A375 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A40
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 84% higher boost clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel/s vs 37.00 GTexel/s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel/s vs 37.00 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 A375
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Launch date | 2015 vs 8 Aug 2022 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A40
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 A375
Name | Intel Arc Pro A40 | AMD Radeon R9 A375 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33127 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1024 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc Pro A40 | AMD Radeon R9 A375 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | DG2-128 | Venus |
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 | 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 663 | 664 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 870.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.963 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.482 TFLOPS | 1184 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 54.40 GPixel/s | 14.80 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel/s | 37.00 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 1500 million |
Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |