Intel Arc Pro A40 vs AMD Radeon R9 A375
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A40 and AMD Radeon R9 A375 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A40
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 84% higher boost clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel/s vs 37.00 GTexel/s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel/s vs 37.00 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 A375
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
| Launch date | 2015 vs 8 Aug 2022 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A40
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 A375
| Name | Intel Arc Pro A40 | AMD Radeon R9 A375 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33127 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1024 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc Pro A40 | AMD Radeon R9 A375 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | DG2-128 | Venus |
| Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 | 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 663 | 664 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 870.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.963 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.482 TFLOPS | 1184 GFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 54.40 GPixel/s | 14.80 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel/s | 37.00 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 7200 million | 1500 million |
| Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 5.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
