AMD Radeon R9 M275X vs NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440-SE
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275X and NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440-SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 37x more texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 64x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 64 MB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 332 MHz
- 425x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1700 vs 4
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 158
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2014 vs 6 February 2002 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 332 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 vs 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 vs 158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440-SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M275X | NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440-SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 | 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 158 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11041 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 283.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.407 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3265 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1228 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3265 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1228 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1705 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M275X | NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440-SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Celsius |
Code name | Venus | NV17 A3 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 28 January 2014 | 6 February 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 1074 | 1072 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 29 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 8.0 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 5.31 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 332 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |