AMD Radeon R9 M275X vs AMD Radeon R7 250E

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275X and AMD Radeon R7 250E videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
• Around 45% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 819.2 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.109 vs 21.562
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3265 vs 2873
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3265 vs 2873

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250E

• 4x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 582.073 vs 283.116
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.2 vs 2.187
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.669 vs 33.837
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.052 vs 91.407
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1228
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1705
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1228
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1705

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250E

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.109 21.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	283.116 582.073
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.187 2.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.837 38.669
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	91.407 98.052
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3265 2873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1228 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3265 2873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1228 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705 3355

Compare specifications (specs)