AMD Radeon R9 M275X vs ATI Radeon HD 5470
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275X and ATI Radeon HD 5470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 7.1x more texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 640 vs 80
- 11.4x better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 41% higher memory clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1700 vs 268
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 298
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1228 vs 960
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1228 vs 960
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 January 2014 vs 13 February 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 vs 268 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 vs 298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1228 vs 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1228 vs 960 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5470
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1771 vs 1705
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1771 vs 1705
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1771 vs 1705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1771 vs 1705 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5470
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M275X | ATI Radeon HD 5470 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 | 268 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 298 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11041 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.109 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 283.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.187 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.407 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3265 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1228 | 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1705 | 1771 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3265 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1228 | 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1705 | 1771 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M275X | ATI Radeon HD 5470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Venus | Cedar |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 28 January 2014 | 13 February 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1074 | 1077 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 292 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 6.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M275X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 440-SE
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9700
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
ATIRadeon HD 5470
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
NVIDIAQuadro K3100M
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
AMDRadeon R7 250E
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
AMDFirePro W4190M
